Understanding the Multiples Approach: A Comprehensive Guide on Valuing Similar Assets

The Multiples Approach is a powerful valuation method used to compare similar companies using standardized financial metrics. Learn the essentials and practical applications of this technique.

The Multiples Approach: Valuing Similar Assets Effectively

The multiples approach is a valuation method based on the idea that similar assets should have similar prices. By assuming that specific financial ratios, such as operating margins or cash flow, are consistent among similar firms, this approach provides a comparative analysis for asset valuation.

Investors often refer to the multiples approach as multiples analysis or valuation multiples. Commonly, financial ratios like the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio are used, also known as the earnings multiple.

Key Takeaways

  • The multiples approach enables comparative analysis or relative valuation of similar companies using consistent financial metrics.
  • There are two major categories of valuation multiples: enterprise value multiples and equity multiples.
  • Commonly used equity multiples include P/E multiple, PEG, price-to-book, and price-to-sales.

Basics of the Multiples Approach: Streamlining Stock Valuation

“Multiples” is essentially a comprehensive term for various indicators that can be used to value a stock. A multiple is calculated by dividing the market or estimated value of an asset by a specific item on the financial statements. This approach aims to value similar companies using the same financial metrics.

An analyst applying this valuation method assumes that a particular ratio is relevant across companies operating in the same industry. The multiples approach captures a firm’s operating and financial characteristics, such as expected growth, in one number that can be multiplied by a financial metric (like EBITDA) to derive enterprise or equity value.

Common Ratios Used in the Multiples Approach

Both enterprise value multiples and equity multiples are employed in this valuation approach. Enterprise value multiples include the enterprise-to-sales (EV/sales) ratio, EV/EBIT, and EV/EBITDA. Equity multiples compare a company’s share price with elements of the company’s performance such as earnings, sales, and book value. Common equity multiples are the price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-earnings to growth (PEG), price-to-book (P/B), and price-to-sales (P/S) ratios.

Equity multiples can be deceptively impacted by changes in capital structure, even when enterprise value remains unchanged. As such, enterprise value multiples are generally seen as better valuation models. They allow for direct comparison across different firms, regardless of capital structure, and are less influenced by accounting differences. Nevertheless, equity multiples are more frequently used by investors because they are easy to calculate and commonly accessible.

Applying the Multiples Approach: A Practical Guide

To use the multiples approach, investors start by identifying similar companies and evaluating their market values. The next step involves calculating a multiple for these comparable firms and aggregating these into a standardized figure, such as the mean or median. This key multiple is then applied to the firm under analysis to estimate its value.

When building a multiple, it is advisable to use a forecast of future profits, aligning with the principle that a company’s value is the present value of its future cash flows rather than past profits.

Example: Evaluating Major Banking Stocks Using the Multiples Approach

Assume an analyst wants to compare major banking stocks using their P/E ratios. By identifying the S&P 500’s largest banking stocks and their P/E ratios, as shown below, they can perform a quick analysis:

Trailing 12-mo. P/E for Top 4 Banks (as of April 1, 2021)
Bank Trailing P/E
Wells Fargo 95.6
Citigroup 15.4
Bank of America 20.8
JP Morgan Chase 17.2

An analyst would immediately notice that Citigroup’s P/E ratio of 15.4x trades at a discount compared to the other three banks. Meanwhile, Wells Fargo’s high P/E ratio of nearly 100x could indicate poor but expectedly improving earnings. The average P/E ratio of these four stocks is:

(95.6 + 15.4 + 20.8 + 17.2) / 4 = 37

This implies that Bank of America, JP Morgan, and Citigroup all trade below the average P/E ratio, offering valuable insights using the multiples approach.

Related Terms: financial ratios, equity value, enterprise value, valuation multiples, operating margins, EBITDA

References

Get ready to put your knowledge to the test with this intriguing quiz!

--- primaryColor: 'rgb(121, 82, 179)' secondaryColor: '#DDDDDD' textColor: black shuffle_questions: true --- ## The multiples approach is primarily used for which financial purpose? - [ ] Performing fundamental analysis - [ ] Managing portfolio risk - [x] Valuing companies - [ ] Determining creditworthiness ## Which financial ratio is most commonly used in the multiples approach? - [x] Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio - [ ] Debt-to-Equity ratio - [ ] Current ratio - [ ] Interest coverage ratio ## When using the multiples approach, comparable companies should have? - [x] Similar business models and industries - [ ] Different sectors and industries - [ ] Varied geographical locations - [ ] Significantly different market capitalization ## Which of the following sectors is likely to apply enterprise value multiples? - [ ] Consumer staples - [ ] Utilities - [ ] Pharmaceuticals - [x] Technology ## How does the multiples approach determine company value? - [ ] Using historical data and future projections - [ ] Comparing cost structures - [ ] Assessing management efficiency - [x] Comparing ratios with peer companies ## Which multiple might be most relevant for valuing highly leveraged companies? - [ ] Price-to-Sales ratio - [ ] Price-to-Book ratio - [x] EV/EBITDA ratio - [ ] Dividend Yield ratio ## In the multiples approach, which of the following is a challenge? - [ ] Availability of comparable data - [ ] Simplicity in calculation - [ ] Direct input from management - [x] Finding truly comparable companies ## Why might the multiples approach be less effective during a market bubble? - [ ] It relies on historical performance - [ ] Market trends are harder to predict - [ ] Calculations are extremely complex - [x] Market valuations are disconnected from fundamentals ## Which is a limitation of the multiples approach? - [ ] It's primarily focused on cash flow analysis - [x] It doesn't account for future growth projections - [ ] Requires detailed timeline assumptions - [ ] Heavily reliant on dividends ## What is a common criticism of the multiples approach? - [x] It oversimplifies company value assessment - [ ] It overly relies on technical analysis - [ ] It only applies to non-public companies - [ ] It lacks application in equity research