What Is Take or Pay?
Take or pay is a provision included in a contract stipulating that a buyer is obligated either to take delivery of goods from a seller or to pay a specified penalty for not doing so. This type of agreement shares risk between both parties, facilitating trade and reducing transaction costs, thereby benefitting the overall economy.
Key Takeaways
-
Guaranteed Payment: Take or pay ensures the seller receives a portion of the agreed payment, even if the buyer doesn’t procure the full quantity of goods.
-
Applicable in High Overhead Sectors: Commonly found in sectors such as energy, where production overheads are substantial.
-
Risk Sharing Benefits: These provisions lower risks associated with capital investments, enabling transactions that might not happen otherwise.
Understanding Take or Pay
A take-or-pay provision usually involves an agreement between a company and its supplier. It mandates the buyer to take a predetermined volume of goods by a specific date or face a financial penalty. This setup mitigates the supplier’s financial risk associated with production investments while giving the buyer room to seek more favorable prices elsewhere. Overall, it facilitates trade by balancing risks, enhancing potential economic gains for both buyer and supplier.
Take-or-pay arrangements are prevalent in sectors with high fixed costs, such as energy. Since the supply costs for energy units like natural gas or crude oil are considerable, take-or-pay contracts provide suppliers the security of investment returns, encouraging upfront capital expenditures. Without these provisions, suppliers would shoulder all the risk if buyers diminish their need for energy or market prices shift unfavorably.
Additionally, buyers might align ongoing purchases with better market prices, reducing overhead losses for suppliers. This anticipation of risk and return generates a more predictable market environment and encourages continued investment and trade.
Examples of Take or Pay
Example 1: Firm A agrees to buy 200 million cubic feet of natural gas from Firm B over 10 years at 20 million cubic feet annually. One year, Firm A only requires 18 million cubic feet. As a result, it pays the penalty for not purchasing the default amount—typically, this fee is a fraction of the contract price, say 50% of the cost for the 2 million cubic feet it didn’t take.
Example 2: Firm A decides to switch suppliers mid-contract due to favorable gas prices from another supplier, Firm C, even after considering the 50% penalty to Firm B. The decision is cost-effective as the total expense for buying gas from Firm C, plus the penalty, remains below the original contract price with Firm B.
In each scenario, both parties benefit: Firm A manages to adhere to the originally planned purchase volume economically, while Firm B secures at least partial payment for undelivered gas, preventing inventory losses.
Who Benefits From Take or Pay?
-
Suppliers: Reduced financial risk enables suppliers to make upfront investments with confidence it’ll earn back their capital.
-
Buyers: Flexibility to engage in future buyer’s markets, allowing them to look for better price options.
-
Economy: Formation of reliable trade networks and reduced transactional costs contribute to a more consistent and dynamic market environment.
What Is a Holdup?
A holdup occurs when a buyer benefits from the supplier’s capital investment while later backing out from the contract, refusing to take the commodity citing price objections. In essence, the buyer takes advantage of the specific investment the supplier made based on their engagement, potentially causing financial setbacks for the supplier.
The Bottom Line
Take or pay allows buyers and sellers to distribute risk efficiently in a commercial setting. If the buyer defaults, the seller still receives the agreed-upon penalty, maintaining financial stability. Meanwhile, the buyer retains some flexibility to adapt to changing economic circumstances, making this provision a win-win in volatile markets.
Related Terms: capital expenditure, contracts, commodity trade, economic surplus, holdup problem.
References
- Thomson Reuters Practical Law. “Supply Agreement: Take-or-Pay Clause”.
- Lexology: Moussas and Partners Law Firm. “Take-or-Pay Clauses in the Natural Gas Sales Contracts and Potential Claims Against Buyers”.
- Research Gate. “A Tribute to Oliver Williamson: Holdup: Implications for Investment and Organization”.
- Columbia University. “Hold-Up Problem”. Page 1.
