R-squared (R²) is defined as a number that tells you how well the independent variable(s) in a statistical model explain the variation in the dependent variable. It ranges from 0 to 1, with 1 indicating a perfect fit of the model to the data.
Whereas correlation explains the strength of the relationship between an independent and a dependent variable, R-squared explains the extent to which the variance of one variable explains the variance of the second variable. So, if the R² of a model is 0.50, then approximately half of the observed variation can be explained by the model’s inputs.
Key Takeaways
-
R-squared is a statistical measure that indicates how much of the variation of a dependent variable is explained by an independent variable in a regression model.
-
In investing, R-squared is generally interpreted as the percentage of a fund’s or security’s price movements that can be explained by movements in a benchmark index.
-
An R-squared of 100% means that all movements of a security (or other dependent variable) are completely explained by movements in the index.
Formula for R-Squared
The calculation of R-squared involves several steps. It includes taking the data points (observations) of dependent and independent variables and conducting regression analysis to find the line of best fit. This regression line helps to visualize the relationship between the variables. From here, you calculate predicted values, subtract actual values, and square the results. These steps involve several coefficient estimates and predictions which are crucial for understanding variable relationships. The squared errors are summed to determine the unexplained variance.
To calculate the total variance, subtract the average actual value from each actual value, square the result, and sum them. This process yields the total sum of squares, an important component in calculating R-squared. Divide the sum of squared errors (unexplained variance) by the total variance, subtract this fraction from one, and you will obtain the R-squared value.
Insights from R-Squared
In investing, R-squared is generally interpreted as the percentage of a fund’s or security’s movements that can be explained by movements in a benchmark index. For example, an R-squared for a fixed-income security vs. a bond index identifies the security’s proportion of price movement predictable based on the index’s movement.
This can also be applied to a stock vs. the S&P 500 Index or any other relevant index. This metric is also known as the coefficient of determination.
R-squared values range from 0 to 1 and are commonly stated as percentages from 0% to 100%. An R-squared of 100% means that all security movements are completely explained by the movements in the index.
In investing, a high R-squared (85% to 100%) indicates the stock’s or fund’s performance aligns closely with the index. A low R-squared (70% or less) suggests the fund does not generally follow the index’s movements. A higher R-squared value indicates a more useful beta figure, which shows risk-adjusted returns.
R-Squared Versus Adjusted R-Squared
R-squared works well in simple linear regression models with one explanatory variable. For multiple regression models with several independent variables, an adjusted R-squared must be used.
Adjusted R-squared compares the descriptive power of regression models with different numbers of predictors, evaluating the goodness of fit by factoring in predictor additions. Predictors artificially inflate R-squared without necessarily improving model performance, while adjusted R-squared compensates by reducing for additional variables; it only increases if the new term genuinely enhances the model. In cases of overfitting, where high R-squared values might be unintentionally obtained, adjusting ensures model reliability.
R-Squared Versus Beta
Beta and R-squared are distinct but related measures of correlation in statistics. Beta measures relative riskiness, evaluating mutual funds and benchmarks correlations mostly during bull markets. R-squared, on the other hand, quantifies how closely asset price changes align with benchmark movements.
Used together, these metrics provide an insight into asset manager performance. A beta of exactly 1.0 equals the risk (volatility) of the asset with its benchmark.
Limitations of R-Squared
R-squared offers an understanding of the relationship between variable movements but does not indicate model quality, whether data and predictions bias exists, or appropriate regression choices. A high or low R-squared is not inherently valuable since it might misrepresent data without proper context.
Key Interpretations and Insights
- Reliability of Fit: R-squared measures the goodness of fit of a model to the observed data. A high value indicates a good match, while a low value might not.
- Model Appropriateness: A high R-squared does not mean the right model is selected or predictions are unbiased.
- Causal Relationship Absence: R-squared does not provide clarity on the cause-and-effect relationships between variables.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can R-Squared Be Negative?
No, R-squared cannot be negative. It ranges strictly between 0 and 1, where 0 indicates no explanatory power of the model and 1 indicates a perfect fit.
What Is a Good P-Value?
In hypothesis testing, a p-value less than or equal to 0.05 indicates strong evidence against the null hypothesis, showing statistically significant results that aren’t due to chance.
Why Is R-Squared Value So Low?
A low R-squared value indicates independent variables aren’t effectively explaining dependent variable variations; factors could include missing relevant variables, non-linear relationships, or inherent data variability.
What Does An R-Squared Value of 0.9 Mean?
An R-squared value of 0.9 means that 90% of the dependent variable variance is explained by the independent variable variance, implying strong explanatory power.
Is a Higher R-Squared Better?
Most often, yes. High R-squared values suggest that the model closely tracks real data changes. However, for actively managed funds, lower values might sometimes signify manager attempts to stray from benchmarks for added value.
Conclusion
R-squared proves useful in contexts, especially investing, assessing variable impacts against a dependent variable. However, remain cautious of its limitations for precise predictive assessments.
Related Terms: Correlation, Beta, Adjusted R-Squared, Risk-Adjusted Returns, Sum of Squares.
