The Hollowing Out Phenomenon: How Declining Manufacturing Jobs Shape Economies

Explore the hollowing out phenomenon, its impact on economies, and how it contributes to the shrinking middle class.

What is Hollowing Out?

Hollowing out refers to the significant decline in a country’s manufacturing sector as producers shift operations to low-cost facilities overseas. This phenomenon leads to a concentration of wealth among the wealthy elite, a diminishing middle class, and an increase in working-class and lower-class households.

Key Takeaways

  • Hollowing out denotes the disappearance of middle-class manufacturing jobs and the associated spending power due to socioeconomic stratification.
  • This results in a greater prevalence of working-class and lower-class households and an accumulation of wealth among the very wealthy.
  • Economists attribute this trend to several factors, including job outsourcing, labor-saving technologies, and demographic shifts.

Understanding Hollowing Out

Over recent decades, many of the world’s leading economies have witnessed hollowing out as manufacturing jobs are relocated to countries with lower labor costs, such as China and Bangladesh. The U.S., for example, saw its manufacturing jobs shrink from over 19 million in 1979 to less than 12 million by 2020. Similarly, Japan experienced a drop in manufacturing employment from nearly 28% in the 1970s to 16.6% by 2012. This decline heavily affects cities and rural areas dependent on plant-based employment.

Not all economists view the outsourcing of manufacturing and the resultant hollowing out of jobs as wholly negative. Some argue that it provides an opportunity for the domestic economy to pivot towards high-skill, high-wage jobs like product design and marketing. They also note that consumers benefit from lower prices on products made overseas.

Moravec’s Paradox

Advancements in robots and other labor-saving technologies are likely to exacerbate the hollowing out of middle-class jobs—a concept encapsulated by Moravec’s paradox. In the 1980s, AI specialists discovered that robots excel at tasks humans find difficult but struggle with tasks that seem easy to humans. Hans Moravec highlighted this by noting that while computers can outperform humans in complex tasks like playing chess, they lag behind in basic activities like cleaning chess pieces.

Hollowing Out Data

Income inequality is escalating in the U.S. and globally, with abundant research indicating a decline in middle-class disposable incomes as the rich grow richer. From 1970 to 2018, the share of total income going to middle-class U.S. households fell from 62% to 43%, while upper-income households saw their share rise from 29% to 48%, according to Pew Research Center. Consequently, the American middle class decreased from 61% in 1971 to 51% in 2019.

The Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) came to a similar conclusion. In examining most of the globe, they found that between the mid-1980s and mid-2010s, middle incomes barely grew in OECD countries. Middle-class income growth was notably slower than the average income growth of the wealthiest 10% as labor markets evolved and living costs surged.

What Caused the Decline of the Middle Class?

Several factors are cited for the erosion of the middle class: outsourcing of jobs, the rise of labor-saving technologies, and increasing costs in sectors like education, healthcare, and housing.

How Much Has the Middle Class Shrunk?

The extent of middle-class shrinkage varies by country, timeframe, and study criteria. In 2020, Pew Research Center reported that the proportion of American adults living in middle-income households decreased from 61% in 1971 to 51% in 2019. Similarly, OECD noted that the share of people in middle-income households across its member countries fell from 64% in the mid-1980s to 61% in the mid-2010s.

How Does a Shrinking Middle Class Affect the Economy?

A shrinking middle class poses significant concerns for economic growth. Historically, the middle class has played a crucial role in consumer spending, driving demand for goods and services and keeping the economy vibrant.

Related Terms: outsourcing, income inequality, economic impact, labor-saving technologies

References

  1. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. “All Employees, Manufacturing”.
  2. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. “Percent of Employment in Manufacturing in Japan (DISCONTINUED)”.
  3. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. “Employment by Economic Activity: Manufacturing: All Persons for Japan”.
  4. Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training. “Hollowing-Out of the Japanese Manufacturing Industry and Regional Employment Development”.
  5. IEEE. “Grasping the Performance: Facilitating Replicable Performance Measures via Benchmarking and Standardized Methodologies”.
  6. Pew Research Center. “Trends in Income and Wealth Inequality”.
  7. OECD. “Under Pressure: The Squeezed Middle Class: Executive Summary”.

Get ready to put your knowledge to the test with this intriguing quiz!

--- primaryColor: 'rgb(121, 82, 179)' secondaryColor: '#DDDDDD' textColor: black shuffle_questions: true --- ## What does the term "Hollowing Out" describe in the context of an industry? - [x] The process of losing middle-level jobs and positions - [ ] The expansion of high-skilled, high-wage jobs - [ ] The increase in lower-skilled and lower-wage jobs - [ ] The growth of middle-class employment opportunities ## Which of the following is a primary cause of the hollowing out effect? - [ ] Increased consumer spending - [ ] Growth in the service sector - [x] Technological advancement and automation - [ ] Declining education standards ## How does hollowing out typically impact income inequality in an economy? - [ ] Reduces income disparity - [ ] Leaves income inequality unchanged - [x] Increases income disparity - [ ] Equalizes earnings among different job categories ## Which sectors are most likely to be affected by the hollowing out phenomenon? - [ ] High-tech and biomedical industries - [x] Manufacturing and routine clerical work - [ ] Arts and entertainment - [ ] Agriculture and farming ## What is a common consequence of hollowing out for workers in affected industries? - [ ] Increased job stability and security - [x] Job displacement or need for retraining - [ ] Higher wages and better benefits - [ ] More opportunities for promotion ## Which factor might exacerbate the hollowing-out effect in contemporary economics? - [ ] Reduction in global trade - [ ] Slowing technological innovation - [x] Offshoring and outsourcing of jobs - [ ] Increase in manufacturing jobs ## How does hollowing out influence the types of jobs available in the market? - [ ] Creates more middle-income jobs - [x] Leads to increase in both high-skill/high-wage and low-skill/low-wage jobs, but reduces middle-income jobs - [ ] Decreases the number of low-skill/low-wage jobs - [x] Boosts the demand for routine clerical jobs ## Which level of education is likely to be most affected by the hollowing out phenomenon? - [ ] Advanced degrees - [x] High school diplomas and some college education - [ ] Elementary education - [ ] Professional technical certifications ## What potential strategy can be employed to mitigate the hollowing out phenomenon? - [ ] Reduce government intervention - [ ] Maintain current workforce policies - [x] Invest in education and workforce training programs - [ ] Create more clerical jobs ## What underlying long-term trend is associated with hollowing out? - [ ] Decreasing global competition - [ ] Increasing local job creation - [x] Accelerating shift towards a knowledge-based economy - [ ] Declining use of technology in workplaces