Understanding Appellate Courts: The Pillars of Justice Review

Learn about the crucial role of appellate courts in the American judicial system, their working process, and important differences compared to supreme courts.

Understanding Appellate Courts: The Pillars of Justice Review

Appellate courts, often referred to as courts of appeals, are a fundamental part of the American judicial system designed to hear and review appeals from legal cases previously adjudicated in trial-level or other lower courts.

Individuals or entities that face unsatisfactory outcomes in these lower courts can file an appeal with an appellate court to have their decisions examined. If the appeal holds merit, the previous ruling might be reversed. Operating at both state and federal levels, appellate courts don’t use a jury, focusing instead on judging the application of the law by the lower courts.

Key Takeaways

  • Appellate courts handle the review of legal decisions from lower courts.
  • These courts exist at both state and federal levels and feature a panel of judges, known as justices, rather than a jury.
  • The federal level boasts 13 appeals courts, while each state maintains its own appellate court system. Some states also include intermediate appellate courts.

How Appellate Courts Work

Appellate courts meticulously review lower court decisions to ensure the proper application of the law. These institutions provide a path for those who’ve faced adverse judgments to have their cases reassessed. If a publicly traded company, for instance, loses a case, a negative judgment may harm their share price. An overturned appeal could cause shares to surge in response.

These courts evaluate the evidence and findings from the trial court to judge if there’s adequate support for the lower court’s decisions, ensuring the law was correctly applied. For cases of profound significance, the U.S. Supreme Court serves as the highest appellate court, which hears appeals that stand out due to their importance.

Appellate Courts vs. Supreme Courts

While appellate courts provide critical review mechanisms, supreme courts—both state and federal—hold superior in their scope and authority. The U.S. Supreme Court stands as the highest authority in America, where it provides final rulings on significant appeals, reviewing decisions made by the federal appellate courts.

At the federal level, there are 13 appellate courts, including 12 district courts and the Federal Circuit court. Multiple states incorporate intermediate appellate courts to manage the heavy caseload experienced by state supreme courts. 41 states currently have at least one of these intermediary levels.

Example of an Appellate Court Ruling

In summer 2020, ride-sharing giants Uber Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc. saw their shares rise after an appellate court delayed the enforcement of a new California law. This law necessitated the reclassification of many gig workers, including rideshare drivers, to employees. The delay provided the appellate court time to assess the appeal’s merit regarding a lower court’s affirmation on the law’s constitutionality.

Yet, by October 2020, the California First District Court of Appeals ruled affirming the law’s legality, making Uber and Lyft liable to treat their California drivers as employees, entitling them to benefits and wages. The U.S. Supreme Court and the U.K. Supreme Court later refused to consider further appeals, firmly endorsing the lower courts’ decisions.

This instance highlights the pivotal role of appellate courts in the judicial landscape, particularly concerning companies’ operational protocols and employee classifications.

Related Terms: Judiciary, Justices, Trial courts, Legal system, Supreme Court, Corporations.

References

  1. CNBC. “Appeals court grants Uber and Lyft a temporary reprieve following threats to shut down in California”. (Aug. 20, 2020).
  2. New York Times. “Appeals Court Says Uber and Lyft Must Treat California Drivers as Employees”. (Oct. 22, 2020).
  3. San Francisco Chronicle. “California Supreme Court rejects Uber, Lyft challenge to gig-work order”.

Get ready to put your knowledge to the test with this intriguing quiz!

--- primaryColor: 'rgb(121, 82, 179)' secondaryColor: '#DDDDDD' textColor: black shuffle_questions: true --- ## What is the primary function of appellate courts? - [ ] To hear new evidence - [x] To review decisions made by lower courts - [ ] To initiate criminal prosecutions - [ ] To draft new legislation ## Which of the following can appellate courts do upon reviewing a case? - [x] Affirm the decision - [x] Reverse the decision - [x] Remand the case - [ ] Initiate a retrial ## What do appellate courts typically review? - [ ] New witness testimonies - [ ] Physical evidence - [x] The application of the law - [ ] Jury deliberations ## Who can file an appeal to an appellate court? - [ ] Any interested third party - [x] A party involved in the case - [ ] Only the original plaintiff - [ ] Only the original defendant ## What is a written opinion issued by appellate courts known as? - [ ] An ordinance - [ ] A statute - [x] An opinion - [ ] A mandate ## In which circumstances can a case be appealed to an appellate court? - [ ] Only if there is a mistrial - [x] If there is a belief the trial court made an error in law - [ ] Only in criminal cases - [ ] If the verdict was unfavorable to either party ## What is 'remanding' a case? - [ ] Rejecting the case outright - [ ] Overhauling the decision - [x] Sending the case back to the lower court for further proceedings - [ ] Arbitrating for case settlement ## Which type of jurisdiction do appellate courts primarily exercise? - [ ] Original jurisdiction - [ ] Both original and appellate jurisdiction - [x] Appellate jurisdiction - [ ] Specialized jurisdiction ## Do appellate courts generally conduct trials? - [ ] Yes, they conduct full-fledged new trials - [x] No, they only review matters of law related to the previous trial - [ ] Yes, but only in civil cases - [ ] Yes, but only in criminal cases ## Are most decisions made by appellate courts? - [ ] Bind lower courts only in the same case - [x] Can set precedents for lower courts within their jurisdiction - [ ] Bind lower courts countrywide - [ ] Are mostly advisory and non-binding